Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Clark v. Thompson et al
as 3:2019cv02126
Plaintiff:
John Barton Clark and John Barto Clark
Defendant:
City of Burleson, Texas, Robert Clint Thompson, Louis Michael Giddings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Woodson et al v. Pearl River County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lashunda Woodson, Melanie Curtis, Cynthia Wilson and others
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Mississippi, Forrest County, Mississippi, John Barton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00471
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin, et al
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
Clark Sales and Rentals, Inc., Clark Sand Company, Inc, Clemco Industries Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Quikrete Materials, Inc. and Sammons BW, Inc. f/k/a Briggs-Weaver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gary, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00381
Plaintiff:
Joe Gary, et al
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
American Sand and Gravel Company, Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc., Big Three Industries Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Quickrete Materials and Sammons BW, Inc. f/k/a Briggs-Weaver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
King, et al, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cornelius King, et al, James Anderson, Terry Carpenter and others
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
American Sand and Gravel Company, Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc., Big Three Industries Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Sammons BW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Clark, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00376
Plaintiff:
Sebell Clark, et al
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation, Clark Sales and Rentals, Inc., Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
