Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Smith v. Weld County Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv02926
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Smith
Defendant:
Weld County Commissioners, John Cooke, David Badley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kessling et al v. Barker et al
as 1:2011cv02192
Plaintiff:
Marjorie A. Kessling and Trenton H. Parker
Defendant:
Bruce (I) T. Barker , Bruce T. Barker , Stephanie (I) L. Arries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Maus et al
as 1:2011cv01777
Plaintiff:
Trenton H. Parker
Defendant:
Daniel (I) S. Maus , Daniel S. Maus , Bruce (I) T. Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Svoboda et al v. Weld County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2009cv02956
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Svoboda and Alice Elizabeth Watson
Defendant:
Weld County Sheriff's Office, John Cooke and Gene Ernest Fischer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dominguez v. Cooke et al
as 1:2009cv02408
Plaintiff:
Pedro Dominguez
Defendant:
John Cooke, Amy, Margo J. Geppert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peart v. Villegas et al
as 1:2009cv02312
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peart
Defendant:
Michael Villegas, John Cooke and County of Weld, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archibeque v. Cooke et al
as 1:2009cv02223
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Archibeque
Defendant:
John Cooke, Jonathan Brown and John Doe Glanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tovar v. Cooke
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
Manuel S. Tovar
Defendant:
John Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archibeque v. Cooke
as 1:2009cv01741
Petitioner:
Anthony Lee Archibeque
Respondent:
John Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Nichols et al
as 1:2009cv01675
Plaintiff:
Andre Frank Lewis
Defendant:
Dana Nichols, John Cooke, Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
