Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramirez et al v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2018cv00632
Plaintiff:
William Ramirez and Stacey Ramirez
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, El Dorado County Sheriff's Department, John D'Agostini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos-Rodriguez v. D'Agostini et al
as 2:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jose Arbor Campos-Rodriguez
Defendant:
John D'Agostini, El Dorado County Sheriff's Department, Kuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Bisantz et al
as 2:2017cv02138
Plaintiff:
Mike Franklin
Defendant:
Joseph Bisantz , John D'Agostini , County of El Dorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Citizens for Fair Representation, et al. v. Padilla
as 2:2017cv00973
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Fair Representation , City of Fort Jones , California Libertarian Party and others
Defendant:
Alex Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. D'Agostini
as 2:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Moon
Defendant:
John D'Agostini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robben v. D'Agostini
as 2:2016cv02742
Petitioner:
Todd Robben
Respondent:
John D'Agostini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02723
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Robben v. El Dorado County et al
as 2:2016cv02697
Plaintiff:
Todd Robben
Defendant:
El Dorado County , El Dorado County Sheriff, John D'Agostini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robben v. El Dorado County et al
as 2:2016cv02695
Plaintiff:
Todd Robben
Defendant:
El Dorado County, Lynn Cavin, Mary Ann Swenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spies et al v. El Dorado County et al
as 2:2016at01170
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Spies and Linda Spies
Defendant:
El Dorado County, California Forensic Medical Group Inc., Marshall Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
