Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Victorinox AG et al v. The B&F System Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03377
Plaintiff:
Victorinox AG , Victorinox Swiss Army Inc and Wenger NA Inc
Defendant:
The B&F System Inc, B&F Group Holding Inc, B&F Designs LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victorinox AG v. The BF System, Inc
as 16-2757
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Victorinox AG, Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. and Wenger NA, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
The BF System, Inc and John D. Meyer
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, 1-10, John Does 1 Through 10 and John Does 1-10
Victorinox AG v. The BF System, Inc
as 16-2690
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Victorinox AG, Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. and Wenger NA, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
The BF System, Inc and John D. Meyer
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Victorinox AG et al v. The B&F System, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv04534
Plaintiff:
Victorinox AG , Victorinox Swiss Army, Inc. and Wenger NA, Inc.
Defendant:
The B&F System, Inc , John D. Meyer , ABC Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Barry Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro, et al
as 10-5738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY WAYNE RAYNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOUISVILLE METRO, A Municipal Corporation, JERRY ABRAMSON, In his capacity as Mayor Louisville Metro, STEVE BESHEAR, Governor, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Scott et al v. City of Louisville Metro et al
as 5:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Vincent Louis Scott and Barry Wayne Rayner
Defendant:
City of Louisville Metro, Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro et al
as 3:2009cv00488
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Rayner
Defendant:
City of Louisville Metro, Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
