Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Davis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2016cv02245
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Cynthia D. Mares , Elizabeth Weishaupl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, John Davis, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ovigian v. Davis
as 1:2014cv00167
Petitioner:
Robert Ovigian
Respondent:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solazzo v. Davis
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Andrew Solazzo
Defendant:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv03073
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Samuels
Defendant:
John Davis, Bynes, (BVCF) Buena Vista Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winder v. Montoya
as 1:2013cv02513
Defendant:
Allison Boyd, Cheryl Davies, Sheila (I) Montoya and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fisher, Josie Amaya, Carole Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv02264
Petitioner:
Tye J. Smith
Respondent:
John Davis, Colorado State Attorney General, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guice v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01134
Petitioner:
Darrel Guice
Respondent:
John Davis and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael J. Fisher
Respondent:
Tom Clements , John Davis and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00034
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent:
John Davis and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
