Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MacDonald v. Brighton Police Chief, et al
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHTON POLICE CHIEF, BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICERS, 1-25 John Does, BRIGHTON SUPERVISING OFFICER, John Does and others
MacDonald v. Brighton Police Chief, et al
as 23-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHTON POLICE CHIEF, BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICERS, 1-25 John Does, BRIGHTON SUPERVISING OFFICER, John Does and others
Harper v. Werfel, et al
as 23-1565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JOHN DOE 1-10 and DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
MacDonald v. Brighton Police Chief, et al
as 23-1331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHTON POLICE CHIEF, BRIGHTON POLICE OFFICERS, 1-25 John Does, BRIGHTON SUPERVISING OFFICER, John Does and others
Does, et al v. Mills, et al
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Interested Party:
MTM ACQUISITION, INC. and SJ ACQUISITION, INC.
Intervenor:
MTM ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Portland Press Herald, /Maine Sunday Telegram, Kennebec Journal, and Morning Sentinel and SJ ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Sun Journal
Skrabec, et al v. Town of North Attleboro, et al
as 17-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK SKRABEC, NEIL SKRABEC and MARY ANN SKRABEC
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH ATTLEBORO, MA, DANIEL ARRIGHI, JOSHUA MCMAHON and others
Clemens v. Doe, et al
as 17-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY L. CLEMENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JANE DOE
Middleborough Veterans' Outrea v. Provencher, et al
as 12-1347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIDDLEBOROUGH VETERANS' OUTREACH CENTER, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL J. PROVENCHER, both Individually and as Middleborough Vererans Agent, ROBERT BURKE and TOWN OF MIDDLEBOROUGH
Defendant:
ANDREA PRIEST, as Director of the Middleborough Council on Aging, MIDDLEBOROUGH COUNCIL ON AGING and JOHN DOES 1-10
Mlodzinski, et al v. Lewis, et al
as 10-1966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff:
AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Sergeant, TIMOTHY J. WOODWARD, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer, GORDON C. RAMSAY, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer and others
Defendant:
CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Mlodzinski, et al v. Cormier, et al
as 10-1967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff:
AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD ARELL, Officer, Northfield Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, STEVE HENRY, Officer, Tilton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, BILL JOLLY, Officer, Groton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
