Cases 31 - 40 of 166
Toson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Durand Toson
Defendant:
Myisha S Taylor, Veronica A Ference, John Doe #1, 1:22-cv-061 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Director TDCJ et al
as 4:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
Elliott Williams
Defendant:
Director TDCJ, Executive Director TDCJ, Warden Pete Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. LaSalle Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mark Richard Walters
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. The City of Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Maxzine Byrd and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas County Texas, Jim Bowles, Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, FNU Phipps, FNU Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Marcum et al
as 4:2021cv03770
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Vance Marcum, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reagan v. Finner et al
as 4:2021cv03411
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Reagan
Defendant:
Troy Finner, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lozada et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada, David Reed, Jr., Ricardo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Hanson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Cris Love, Kim Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Smead et al
as 4:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Smead #664, FNU Andrews, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
