Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DOBIN et al
as 2:2018cv17515
Defendant:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HON. ANNE B. THOMPSON, ANDREA DOBIN, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAMARA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAMARA, JR. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
BURNS v. WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR et al
as 1:2008cv04234
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
