Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FARRINGTON v. FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FARRINGTON
Defendant:
FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS GOULD, DAKOTA WILLHOITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Renzullo v. Town of Wakefield et al
as 1:2020cv11961
Defendant:
Town of Wakefield, John Doe I, John Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Renzullo, BR and PR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Deluca et al v. Merner et al
as 4:2015cv40094
Plaintiff:
Michael Deluca and Dawn Deluca
Defendant:
Robert Merner , John Doe I Boston Police Officer, John Doe II Boston Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fontanez et al v. Pires et al
as 4:2009cv40203
Plaintiff:
Tanika Fontanez, Jarmil Tharpe and Kaamil Jenkins
Defendant:
Danielle Pires, Sean Baxter, Deborah Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiles v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2009cv30064
Plaintiff:
Louis Jiles
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Stephen Hill, David Barton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv30003
Plaintiff:
Lucy Jones
Defendant:
Robert McFarlin, John Doe I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Echevarria-Perez et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2007cv01045
Plaintiff:
Veronica Echevarria-Perez, Francis Velez-Velez, Conjugal Partnership Velez-Echevarria and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Correction and Rehabilitation Administration, Miguel Perreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
