Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Miller v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Spaulding, Fogelman, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALMONTI v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2014cv07060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALMONTI
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN , CRAIG BERGER , LABERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2014cv05796
Plaintiff:
KHALIL PRICE
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT , HEDLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARPER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv05299
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SHARPER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MCCARTHY, BUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKNIGHT v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2014cv04613
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCKNIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanklin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00973
Plaintiff:
Frank Shanklin
Defendant:
Harrell Watts , Jeff Allen , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourne v. Gavin et al
as 3:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Robert Bourne
Defendant:
Gavin, Rhinehouse, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNLEE v. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
EARL BROWNLEE
Defendant:
PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SHERLLEY MOORE-SMEAL, MICHAEL HARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. McVey et al
as 1:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Roberto Rivera
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, Judith Selvey, George Burtner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEASLEY v. THE COUNTY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 3:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD BEASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, II, JOHN DOE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
