Cases 41 - 50 of 61
MCCANTS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04259
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCANTS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, KIMBER ZERWECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTALVO v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 2:2010cv02617
Plaintiff:
ROGELIO MONTALVO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PACHECO et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68117
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PACHECO and CAROLINA G PACHECO
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLAUSIER v. BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOWN et al
as 2:2010cv01320
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEIL GLAUSIER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOWN, GLENN RASP, JAMES R. MCGOWAN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRATER-COLON-EZENGWA
as 2:2010cv00371
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA WATER REVENUE DEPARTMENT, NANCY KAMMERNIER, M. DULEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MURRAY v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv01098
Plaintiff:
GLENN ASA MURRAY
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, DICK SHELLENBERGER, MOLLY HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
