Cases 21 - 30 of 799
Rose v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Qaurra Rose
Defendant:
C.O Rodriguez, Erin Reyes, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuffli v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jarl Tuffli
Defendant:
State of Oregon, ODOC, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Genius Fund et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrow
Defendant:
Genius Fund, Liam Palmieri, Chris Finelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant:
Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Mason Lake
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pena-Venegas et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
Izabel Pena-Venegas and Beverly Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., RB Health (US) LLC, The Procter & Gamble Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Quirk v. Marion County
as 6:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Devin Michael Quirk
Defendant:
Marion County, Marion County Jail, Marion County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harpole v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Jackson G. Harpole
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe and Cholula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slate v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Jason Slate
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Thomas Bristol, Sean Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
