Cases 1 - 10 of 1,400
CITY OF HIGH POINT v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HIGH POINT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
CITY OF GREENSBORO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
TOWN OF SILER CITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF SILER CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Gaddy
Defendant:
Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polidi v. Boston et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Louis Boston, David Shewchuk, Charletta Blackshear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
