Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Porter v. Des Moines Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Des Moines Police Department, John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marco Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stark v. Hacker et al
as 3:2018cv03063
Defendant:
Jana Hacker, Trenton Wensel, Kourtney Pearson and others
Plaintiff:
Jaymes Anthony Stark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Eibeck, Tromos, Kenton County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redowl et al v. Iowa, State of et al
as 3:2018cv03025
Plaintiff:
Trey Redowl, Lawrence Tyndall, Lamonte Bertucci and others
Defendant:
Iowa, State of , Judy Morrison , Iowa Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khouanmany v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2017cv00438
Plaintiff:
Vilaychith Khouanmany
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Phillips et al
as 4:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome Roe, Jr
Defendant:
Donald Phillips, Christopher Swoop, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Billy D Frazier, IV
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Beaumont Texas, John Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker v. Beauchamp et al
as 4:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
John Harker
Defendant:
Asa Beauchamp, John Does #1 through #3, Lars Rude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker v. Libe et al
as 4:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
John Harker
Defendant:
Sonia Libe, Brad Hoenig, Mick Geerdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
