Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Harrison v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Sharon Harrison
Defendant:
Houchens Food Group, Inc. and John Does 2-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKinney v. Mayor, et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Max Benton McKinney
Defendant:
Mayor, Commander in Chief, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. City of Columbus et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shaquera Wilson
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Columbus Police Department, Lamont Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoyle v. City of Hernando et al
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Adrian Hoyle
Defendant:
City of Hernando, Scott Worsham, Officer Lynn Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oaks v. Huttig Building Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00276
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Huttig Building Products, Inc. and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oaks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolan v. Bunzl plc et al
as 3:2018cv00206
Defendant:
Bunzl plc, Transforce, Inc., Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Wiley Sanders Truck Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bass v. John Doe 1 et al
as 4:2018cv00144
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and Bolivar County, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Charles Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Charles Barr
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cable v. Coombs et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cable
Defendant:
Melinda Coombs , Kroger Management Co. , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hogan v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hogan
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Clifton Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
