Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Keller v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit et al
as 2:2013cv02166
Plaintiff:
Curtis Keller
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bassham v. Schofield et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bassham
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Reuben Hodge, David Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
David Leroy Lee
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 (Phoenix) and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Greene County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Valerie Norton
Defendant:
Greene County, Tennessee, Greene County Commission, Steven Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Ray
as 3:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jaimerio Askew
Defendant:
Gayle Ray , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck v. Gilligan et al
as 3:2010cv01054
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alexander Tuck
Defendant:
Candice Gilligan, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulghum v. Boyce et al
as 4:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Fulghum
Defendant:
Randall Boyce, (f/n/u) Bear, (f/n/u) Cam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulghum v. Boyce et al
as 1:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Fulghum
Defendant:
Randall Boyce, (f/n/u) Bear, (f/n/u) Cam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrell v. Collier et al
as 1:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Wayne Merrell
Defendant:
Curtis Collier, William Carter, Scott Winnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Willie Thornton
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, Charles Traughber, William R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
