Cases 21 - 30 of 115
D'Alessandro, III v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Christopher Lane, Damauro, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Lt. Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. Cherokee County
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Aron Major
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff Office, Frank Reynolds, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. Rockdale County
as 1:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Aron Major
Defendant:
Rockdale County Sheriff Office, Rockdale County, City of Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarter v. Inch et al
as 6:2021cv02021
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McCarter
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Barry Sanders
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, ICT Board John Doe1, ICT Board John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Reddish et al
as 3:2021cv00792
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Williams
Defendant:
B. V. Reddish, S. Thompson, Brian Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. John Doe 1 et al
as 6:2021cv01104
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 4, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Gregory and Vinny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Knott et al
as 3:2021cv00529
Defendant:
Hall, John Doe's, John Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Renard Washington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ettienne Modeste v. Hillsborough County Sheriff Department, et al
as 8:2021cv00702
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne Modeste, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe 4, Falkenburg County Jail, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
