Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Degree v. Gendreau et al
as 1:2024cv10686
Plaintiff:
Tina Degree
Defendant:
Stephen Gendreau, James Fay, Donald G Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daddeh et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv13116
Plaintiff:
Louise Harris Daddeh
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, City of Lowell, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 4:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Korluh Kennedy
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Joseph Osmanski, III, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2020cv11825
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Michael Gomes, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Konze v. City of Salem, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv12191
Defendant:
City of Peabody, Police Officer John Doe 3, Police officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
David Konze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Haspell et al
as 1:2019cv11083
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
