Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022oe00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinonez v. IMI Material Handling Logistics Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plinio Alvarado Quinonez
Defendant:
John Doe 7, Justin Parsons, Laporte Consultants Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kuhn et al v. Zehringer et al
as 2:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Darrell Kuhn , Kevin Kuhn , Baucher Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James Zehringer , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
