Cases 31 - 40 of 931
OBUZOR v. CLAYTON et al
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
JOANNA OBUZOR
Defendant:
JESSE CLAYTON, ROSS KENNEDY, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Propst v. Williamsport, PA et al
as 4:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Stacey Propst, Sr., Erika Propst, Jah'sin Propst and others
Defendant:
Williamsport, Pa, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conklin v. Reedy et al
as 1:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Jason M Conklin
Defendant:
Larry F. Reedy, III, John Does 1-25 and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ANGELL et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
KELLY ANGELL and DERONE LEWIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, OFFICER STEPHEN MESCAN, DETECTIVE JAMES MONKELIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCNEIL v. CHIODO et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCNEIL
Defendant:
OFFICER RYAN CHIODO, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and OFFICER JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTES v. HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
CARLTON S. ESTES
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER-BELL v. HALL et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN MILLER-BELL
Defendant:
SARA HALL, REVEREND MICHAEL GESTRICH, SHAWNA WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
