Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Monical v. Nofziger et al
as 6:2018cv02214
Defendant:
Craig Prins, Micheal Gower, R. Foss and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Monical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alqudah v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv02143
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rajaa Alqudah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bursell v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01978
Defendant:
Vaafusuaga, Amsberry, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Isaac Bursell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hasson v. Meyer et al
as 3:2018cv01928
Defendant:
Sgt. Dwyer, John Does 4-10, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Hasson and Robert Hasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konecny v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01842
Defendant:
Vaafusuaga, Amsberry, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Ehren Konecny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livesley v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2018cv01023
Defendant:
City of Springfield, City of Springfield City Police Department, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
George P. Livesley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudolph v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00607
Defendant:
John Aly, Jason Bell, Brad Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Hamzai Tarik Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00375
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Luz A. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Arnold v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
David Ray Arnold
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monical v. Marion County Jail et al
as 6:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Deputy "John Doe 1", Deputy "John Doe 2", "John Doe" Dunnbarr and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Monical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
