Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Banegas v. Doe #2 et al
as 3:2018cv02670
Defendant:
John Doe #2 and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Juan Fernando Mejia Banegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Sliwinski v. Maysent et al
as 3:2018cv02653
Defendant:
Leslie Kobayashi, Patty Maysent, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Emil Sliwinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mimms v. Faulconer et al
as 3:2018cv01339
Petitioner:
Jared Benjamin Mimms
Defendant:
Kevin Faulconer, John Doe 1, Leo Valentine, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kenner et al
as 3:2018cv01006
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
M. Kenner, P. Gonzalez, E. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hodges, et al
as 3:2018cv00846
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
John Hodges, R.J.D. Medical Staff Building 2, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
Steve Marquez
Defendant:
United States, Bureau of Prisons, David L. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe #1 et al v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2017cv01581
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
San Diego, City of and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tran v. Barona Casino et al
as 3:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Tran and Hoang Minh Tran
Defendant:
Barona Casino, San Diego, County of, CA, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tran v. California, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
Hoang Minh Tran
Defendant:
California, State of, San Diego, County of, San Diego, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennings v. San Diego Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv02318
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Tyler Pennings
Defendant:
San Diego Sheriff's Department, Barrera, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
