Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson et al v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson and Jessica Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Destin Owens, Calloway County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. FBOP et al
as 6:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Roland Brown
Defendant:
FBOP, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Well Path Medical Service
as 3:2019cv00543
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lee Brown
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Service, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkhub v. Louisville County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00101
Defendant:
John Doe#1, John Doe#4, Lucas County Jail & Detention and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Hamdan Alkhub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shain v. Grayson County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
W. Curtis Shain
Defendant:
Grayson County, Kentucky, Darwin Dennison, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mora v. Rios et al
as 7:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
William Mora
Defendant:
Rios, Bapps, Linaweaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mullikin et al v. Rice et al
as 2:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jason Mullikin
Defendant:
Ron Rice, Justin Horch, Lisa O'Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemons v. Spradlin et al
as 7:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Shelby Lemons
Defendant:
D. Spradlin, P. Cruze, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parks v. Cushwa et al
as 6:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Darrell J. Parks
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eltayib v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
Abdel Eltayib
Defendant:
Stephen M. Dewalt, Harley Lappan, Kimberly White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
