Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Schultz v. Houle et al
as 1:2023cv10049
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Schultz
Defendant:
Keith R. Houle, Officer Lawson, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2019cv11982
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Scott Murray, Corey Pointer, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv14256
Plaintiff:
Deric King
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Osvaldo Vidal, Anthony Mandonza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv11013
Plaintiff:
Andrew A Davenport
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Luis Spencer, Veronica Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 4:2012cv30089
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv30089
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cruz
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas, et al v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2011cv10884
Plaintiff:
Felix Cuevas and Luz Vargas
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
