Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cowan v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Tremaine D. Cowan
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Interested Party:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muya v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Dadiri Muya
Defendant:
Little, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Ross et al
as 1:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Rice
Defendant:
Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Sgt. Trooper John Doe #1, Sgt. Trooper John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022oe00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
