Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lewallen v. Holt et al
as 6:2023cv05852
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Lewallen
Defendant:
Deputy Jeremy Holt, Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Johnny Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
as 0:2023cv03974
Plaintiff:
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Miranda A. Brown, Be-Dazzled Out, Skills Untouchable LLC, Homagic LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nicolai v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03475
Plaintiff:
Karl J Nicolai
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc , Rasier LLC and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oldfield Community Association v. TI Oldfield Development LLC et al
as 9:2017cv00794
Plaintiff:
Oldfield Community Association
Defendant:
TI Oldfield Development LLC , TI Oldfield Operations LLC , Phillip Galbreath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv02804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lynch et al v. Dining Concepts Group LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00580
Defendant:
Dining Concepts Group LLC, Sandeep Patel, John Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Lynch, John Michael Jones, Brittany Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Love et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01636
Plaintiff:
Kecia N Love and Herbert M Love
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
