Cases 1 - 10 of 90
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorcinvil v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jacques Dorcinvil
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Sean Milligan, Laura Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toussaint v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2023cv06622
Plaintiff:
Dwight Toussaint
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toussaint v. John Doe 1 et al
as 9:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Dwight Toussaint
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Howard et al
as 9:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Topel, Sgt. Brinkerloft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rashid v. Kurtulus et al
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Kalican Kurtulus, Jerome F French, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dorsey
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John Doe's, John Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. West et al
as 9:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Jackson
Defendant:
Sergeant West, D. Fenlong, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
