Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Clark v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv05064
Plaintiff:
Norman Clark
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GARLAND et al v. EAGLE CRUSHER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
DENNIS GARLAND and KATHLEEN GARLAND
Defendant:
EAGLE CRUSHER COMPANY, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RYAN et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
EDYTHE RYAN and JOSEPH RYAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., JOHN DOE #1-5 and JOHN DOE #6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
POWERS v. COGENTRIX/CARNEYS POINT, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv04267
Plaintiff:
HENRY POWERS
Defendant:
COGENTRIX/CARNEYS POINT, INC., COGENTRIX/LOGAN, INC., COGENTRIX EASTERN AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
GLAHN et al v. TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv04181
Plaintiff:
LINDA GLAHN and DAVID GLAHN
Defendant:
TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC., TRUMP HOTELS AND CASINO RESORTS, TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2007cv01629
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services , Elizabeth G Patterson , Kim S Aydlette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUIZ et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2007cv02698
Plaintiff:
HONORIA RUIZ and MARIO PINEDA
Defendant:
WALTER BROWN, JOHN DOE #1-5 and JOHN DOE #6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PARRETTA et al v. GEORGE BALLOUZ CONTRACTORS et al
as 2:2007cv01489
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PARRETTA and CONNIE PARRETTA
Defendant:
GEORGE BALLOUZ CONTRACTORS, JOHN DOE CONTRACTORS #1-5, JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
