Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Crawford v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2017cv08075
Plaintiff:
Steven Crawford
Defendant:
Montgomery, S. Urbanski, R. Rappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv05978
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Norma J. Thomas, Hylton U. Thomas and John Doe # 1 through John Doe # 6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguedi v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04430
Plaintiff:
Gerard Nguedi
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bill Bratton, Brian Caulfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv04212
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 7:2016cv02797
Plaintiff:
Marcia Robinson
Defendant:
Trevor Baker, Orra Wood, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barton v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv07690
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv04017
Plaintiff:
Jameek Harris and LeShawn Drew
Defendant:
Carlos Thomas, Anthony Mangano, John Doe, 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv03660
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc. , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cross_claimant:
Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
City of White Plains and City of White Plains Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03080
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walton
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
