Cases 1 - 10 of 19
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOBY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBY
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN DOE #1, OFC. A. RODRIGUEZ, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PCS WIRELESS LLC v. DOE et al
as 2:2019cv12593
Plaintiff:
PCS WIRELESS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 6, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. DOBIN et al
as 2:2018cv17515
Defendant:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HON. ANNE B. THOMPSON, ANDREA DOBIN, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLIOTT v. DOE et al
as 3:2018cv06348
Plaintiff:
TARIQ ELLIOTT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JAMES PIGOTT, MICHAEL DEANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MERONVIL v. JANE DOE #1 et al
as 2:2017cv08055
Plaintiff:
LEO MERONVIL
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
JESSICA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
EADDY v. CHERRY HILL CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv06979
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE EADDY
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL CENTER, INC., JC PENNEY INC. , JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
