Cases 11 - 19 of 19
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAMARA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAMARA, JR. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
BURNS v. WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR et al
as 1:2008cv04234
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
WARDEN ERIC TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAVIN v. BOROUGH OF LAKE COMO et al
as 3:2007cv02479
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. GAVIN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LAKE COMO, LAKE COMO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAVIN v. BOROUGH OF LAKE COMO et al
as 3:2007cv02478
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GAVIN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LAKE COMO, LAKE COMO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE 1 CHIEF OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00593
Plaintiff:
LUCY WOODS, CARMEN SUAREZ and OLGA ALICIA MALAGA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT LAUGHLIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
