Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Antonelly v. John Doe Nassau County Correctional Officers et al
as 2:2024cv01935
Plaintiff:
Castro Cuadrado Antonelly
Defendant:
John Doe Nassau County Correctional Officers, John Doe Commissioner, John Doe Maintenance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. John Doe C.O. et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
John Doe C.O., John Doe Watch Commander, John Doe Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. John Doe C.O. et al
as 1:2020cv11048
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
John Doe C.O., John Doe Watch Commander, John Doe Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSilva v. John Doe Correctional Officer et al
as 1:2017cv05601
Plaintiff:
Jace DeSilva
Defendant:
John Doe Correctional Officer, Tanisha Mills, John Doe Commissioner of D.O.C.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mai v. John Doe, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv07448
Defendant:
John Doe, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Hong Mai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Babury v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2013cv05356
Plaintiff:
Ahmad J. Babury
Defendant:
Chief of Patrol John Hunter, Chief of the Department Steven Skrynecki, John Does Commissioners and Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arce v. New York City Former Commissioner Bernard et al
as 1:2011cv08342
Plaintiff:
Julio Arce
Defendant:
New York City Former Commissioner Bernard, Anthony Schemeri, Rikers Island Capt. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2011cv00934
Defendant:
Assistant Commissioner David Mack, Assistant Commissioner Robert Codignotto, Chief of Patrol John Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
