Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
8 Lane Investment, Inc v. GenTech Scientific, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01686
Plaintiff:
8 Lane Investment, Inc doing business as VRX Labs
Defendant:
GenTech Scientific, Inc., John Doe I and John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stevie Lee Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv02299
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciron B. Springfield v. Kathleen Allision et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
Kathleen Allision, Cherri Pham, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tianjin Zhongyuan Automobile Trading Co. Ltd. v. Auto Net LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01492
Defendant:
Chi Ho Li, John Doe II, AUTO NET LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIANJIN ZHONGYUAN AUTOMOBILE TRADING, CO., LTD. and Tianjin Zhongyuan Automobile Trading Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06045
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, L.A. County Times Warner, Rickey Louis Alford and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, Municipal Court Corporation, Sheriff Deputy Servillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Showtime Networks Inc. v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2017cv06041
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, 2 and John Does
Plaintiff:
Showtime Networks Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01761
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derrick Johnson v. John Doe I et al
as 5:2015cv00199
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
