Cases 1 - 10 of 18
(PC) Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevie Lee Boston v. John Doe I et al
as 2:2022cv02299
Plaintiff:
Stevie Lee Boston
Defendant:
John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciron B. Springfield v. Kathleen Allision et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
Kathleen Allision, Cherri Pham, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Gomez et al
as 3:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Angela Bartosik, John Doe VI, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06045
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, L.A. County Times Warner, Rickey Louis Alford and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, Municipal Court Corporation, Sheriff Deputy Servillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Epps et al
as 3:2016cv01829
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shawn Lockhart
Defendant:
Epps, Fred Figueroa, Dennis Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remund v. Zamudio et al
as 3:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. Remund
Defendant:
Fernando Zamudio, R. Holt and Jane and John Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Johnson v. John Doe I et al
as 5:2015cv00199
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Edrosa v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv02912
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Edrosa
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, R. Anderson, Gallindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Bradley Oppedahl v. Orange County Healthcare Agency et al
as 8:2013cv01388
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Oppedahl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
