Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Tianjin Zhongyuan Automobile Trading Co. Ltd. v. Auto Net LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01492
Defendant:
Chi Ho Li, John Doe II, AUTO NET LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIANJIN ZHONGYUAN AUTOMOBILE TRADING, CO., LTD. and Tianjin Zhongyuan Automobile Trading Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Franklin v. Gomez et al
as 3:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Angela Bartosik, John Doe VI, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06045
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, L.A. County Times Warner, Rickey Louis Alford and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, Municipal Court Corporation, Sheriff Deputy Servillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2020cv00618
Plaintiff:
William Robbins
Defendant:
John Does I-V and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormick v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2020cv00003
Defendant:
John Does, I - V and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
William McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02178
Plaintiff:
Carey L Johnson
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, U.S Border Patrol Agent Clark, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Asiacell Communications PJSC v. John Doe I
as 3:2017cv07203
Plaintiff:
Asiacell Communications PJSC
Defendant:
John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Showtime Networks Inc. v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2017cv06041
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, 2 and John Does
Plaintiff:
Showtime Networks Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01761
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
