Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of New Orleans, et al
as 2:2020cv01328
Defendant:
John Doe, II, U.S. Central and Southern Province, Society of Jesus, John Doe, III and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Doe v. Kanakuk Ministries et al
as 3:2013cv03030
Plaintiff:
John Doe, III
Defendant:
Kanakuk Ministries a/k/a and/or d/b/a, Kanakuk Kamp, Kanakuk Kamps, Kanakuk, Kanakuk-Kanakomo Kamps, Christian Children's Charity, Kanakuk Alumni Foundation, Kanakuk Heritage Inc a/k/a and/or d/b/a Kanakuk Missouri Inc, Kanakuk Kamps Inc, Kankuk Kamps, K-Kamps Inc, Kanakuk-Kanakomo Kamp, Kanakuk-Kanakomo Kamps, Kanakuk-Kanakomo Kamp Inc and Peter D. Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mowery v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ernie Mowery
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC , Charles Autry , John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe, et al v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School, et al
as 09-41108
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JOHN DOE, II, JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE, III
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ST. STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL and ROBERT E. KIRKPATRICK, His Predecessors and Successors, as Headmaster of St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LYDELL TUCKER, DON A. WIMBERLY, The Right Reverend, His Predecessors and Successors, as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas and PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH COUNCIL OF THE DIOCESE OF TEXAS
Amicus Curiae:
TEXAS ASSOCIATION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT and SURVIVORS NETWORK OF THOSE ABUSED BY PRIESTS
Doe, et al. v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School, et al.
as 2:2008cv00299
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II, John Doe, II, John Doe and others
Defendant:
St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Robert E. Kirkpatrick, Don A. Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
