Cases 41 - 50 of 65
PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC. v. ESAOTE NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al.
as 1:2014cv02075
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and ESAOTE NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wohlleber v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
Edward Wohlleber
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARLOW v. LEWIS et al
as 4:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
MARILYN BARLOW
Defendant:
DANIEL L. BROWN, JOHN DOES 1 - 10 and JOHN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisolm v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01647
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Chisolm
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and John Does 1-10
WAKLEY et al v. FRONTERA PRODUCE, LTD et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Defendant:
ALDI, INC., CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., FRONTERA PRODUCE, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
K. P., DAVID PACIOREK and MICHELLE WAKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Urciouli et al v. Cahill MD et al
as 3:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Donato Urciouli and Debra Urciouli
Defendant:
James W Cahill MD, Biomet Inc , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1-10
as 1:2012cv01291
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-10
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00346
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
