Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dumond v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2023cv24511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L Rodrigues, John Doe No.1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2023cv23110
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez, John Doe No.1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Kowalczyk v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Defendant:
Thomas Jacobs and John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Delaney v. Upsolve, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, Andrew Delaney and others
Defendant:
Upsolve, Inc., Rohan Pavuluri, President and Fellows of Harvard College and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Weston Insurance Management, LLC v. Lyons et al
as 1:2021cv24347
Plaintiff:
Weston Insurance Management, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Christopher Lyons and John Does 1-2
DOE NO 2 et al v. THE TALIBAN et al
as 1:2021mc23422
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE NO 2, John No. 1 Doe, JOHN DOE NO. 3 and others
Defendant:
THE TALIBAN, AL QAEDA and THE HAQQANI NETWORK
Grenon v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2021cv81277
Plaintiff:
Mr. John David Grenon
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, Yordan Perez, William Rothman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
