Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Keith v. Pluff et al.
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Melvina S. Keith
Defendant:
Officer Ashlyn Pluff, Officer Adam Hobbs, John Does 1-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv03803
Plaintiff:
Deanna Nichols
Defendant:
Honda Development & Manufacturing of America LLC, Adecco USA, INC., Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Vazquez, Jr. et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2020cv01551
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Tito Vazquez, Jr., John Thomas MacDonald, Jr. and John Does 1 - 8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TCYK, LLC v. Does 1-8
as 2:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
TCYK, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rynoryder Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-8
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Rynoryder Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bowman et al v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Montel E Bowman and G'Andrea Wright
Defendant:
Dale Hamilton , Department of Veterans Affairs and John Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Eaton et al v. Cantagallo et al
as 1:2010cv01275
Plaintiff:
Howard Eaton and Loretta Eaton
Defendant:
Anthony Cantagallo , Robert D Stell , City of Ashtabula and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fitzpatrick et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2010cv00855
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and John Does (1-8)
Plaintiff:
Pierre Fitzpatrick and Tamika Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amoako-Okyere v. John Does 1-8 et al
as 2:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tonya Amoako-Okyere and Tonya Amoako-Okyere
Defendant:
John Does 1-8 and Church of the Messiah United Methodist Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
