Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Sims v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
TERENCE SIMS
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc., VATAN CARGO GROUP, LLC and John Doe
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bailey et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Quentajah Bailey and Nydia Brown
Defendant:
John Doe and Groendyke Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DANCE v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
RHODDY DANCE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and SHARKEY TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. DOE et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
MARSHA JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and WALMART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Omegbu v. Green et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
D Pritzlaffci, PKSD Law Firm, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Fidelis I Omegbu
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Singh v. Doe et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Defendant:
John Doe and ANG Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jasmail Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laney v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02811
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Uber Technologies Inc., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Krask v. Grimm et al
as 2:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Arthur H. Grimm, Sprint/United Management Company, Roe Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Krask
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sturgis v. R+L Carriers Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sturgis
Defendant:
R+L CARRIERS INC., GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC., R+L TRANSFER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ramos et al
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Jerilynn Langwith, Daniel J Waterhouse, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Cameron Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
