Cases 1 - 10 of 7,662
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
DENZEL EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
FITZGERALD II v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2024cv21925
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, LISA and JOHN DOE Defendants
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bless, Alfredo v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80636
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless and Alfredo -a- Bless
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Wattum Management, Inc. v. Chengdu Chenxiyu Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv21052
Defendant:
Chengdu Chenxiyu Technology Co., Ltd., OKX, Binance Holdings Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Wattum Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
