Cases 1 - 10 of 1,613
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title 9 of the Education Amendment Act of 1972
Glasscock v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Harper Glasscock
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Infinity Ward, Inc., Sledgehammer Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe et al v. GEICO Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jack Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Key v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Matthew Key
Defendant:
John Doe and T-Brothers Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jackson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation doing business as QuikTrip #180 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leist v. Short et al
as 4:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Zachary Leist
Defendant:
Brenda Short, Jeremy Rempel and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. SSM Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
SSM Healthcare Corporation doing business as SSM Health and Navvis & Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
