Cases 1 - 10 of 1,765
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Lander et al
as 6:2024cv06296
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bennett
Defendant:
Officer Lander, Officer Ferguson, Officer McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Korytko et al v. Monsanto Co. et al
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Mark Korytko and Ia Dac Korytko
Defendant:
Monsanto Co. and Does John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe v. State University of New York at Geneseo et al
as 6:2024cv06272
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
State University of New York at Geneseo, KEELY BIELAT SOLTOW, LEONARD SANCILIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Parks et al
as 6:2024cv06270
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
W. Parks, Sheriff Todd K. Baxter, The County of Monroe, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
