Cases 41 - 50 of 770
Riskus v. United Employee Benefit Fund et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
George Riskus
Defendant:
United Employee Benefit Fund, Herbert O. McDowell III and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vetnique Labs LLC v. Mari's Gifts Inc et al
as 1:2022cv07186
Plaintiff:
Vetnique Labs LLC
Defendant:
Mari's Gifts Inc, Mari Chalouh and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare et al
as 1:2022cv07184
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare, Anish K. Patel and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brownlow v. Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06982
Plaintiff:
Marcia Brownlow
Defendant:
Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Trojan Professional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06766
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Trojan Professional Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Handpiece Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06725
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Handpiece Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2022cv06711
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Health Communications, L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lugo v. Village of Washburn, Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01387
Plaintiff:
John Lugo
Defendant:
Village of Washburn, Illinois, Ginger Humphrey and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Annabell Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Simpkins et al
as 3:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess, Daniel Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
