Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Madison County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02982
Plaintiff:
Darius Williams
Defendant:
Madison County, Mississippi, Sheriff Randy Tucker, Deputy John Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garlic v. Pearl River County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Theodore Garlic
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Mississippi, Sheriff David Allison and John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flynt v. Jasper County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Deputy R.H. Stockman, John Does 1 & 2, Jasper County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Flynt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2019cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sharron Hawkins
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Chief Robert Kirklin, Officer John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Collums et al
as 3:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
Barry Carr
Defendant:
John Does 1-2, Pontotoc County, Mississippi and Luke Collums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Brown
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Lee Vance, Justin Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety Bureau of Narcotics et al
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Little
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety Bureau of Narcotics , City of Fulton, Mississippi , Reginald Reggie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Lawrence County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriff's Department , Christian Davis and John Does 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
