Cases 21 - 30 of 38
TORRES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv05121
Plaintiff:
LUCECITA TORRES and KEYSHINE PATTERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CUNNINGHAM, SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2015cv01161
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Richardson
Defendant:
Kevin Kauffman, Whitesel, Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
RAYMOND SINGLETON, MICHAEL EDINGER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAHILL et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAHILL
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HERRAN , OFFICER JOHN DOE (1-4) and others
Movant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. GIALLOMBARDO et al
as 2:2013cv07648
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY JENKINS
Defendant:
GENE GIALLOMBARDO, SCHULTZ, PAPI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNT v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2013cv05230
Plaintiff:
VAMIR HUNT
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , MICHAEL CANFIELD , BENOZICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GIBSON
Defendant:
CARL ROBINSON, JR., JOHN DOE #1-4 and BOROUGH OF NORRISTOWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SIV et al v. THORN et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
SOPHAL SIV , TONY KOAM , SOYITHA SIV and others
Defendant:
THORN , THOMAS REHIEL , POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILVESTRE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05626
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO SILVESTRE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01084
Plaintiff:
MICAL JENKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , WILLIAM MATHIEU , ROBERT PEACHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
