Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nexon America Inc et al v. John Does 1-9 et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, John Does 1-9, John Does 10-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Nexon America Inc and Nexon Korea Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Linlor v. Five9, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
James Linlor
Defendant:
Five9, Inc. and John Does #1-#9
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Domingo v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00136
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and JOHN DOES 1-9
Plaintiff:
Luis C Domingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aluya v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al
as 1:2013at00601
Plaintiff:
Joseph Usunubu Aluya
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC) and JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sutton v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al
as 1:2013at00600
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwight Sutton
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC) and JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hammond v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al
as 1:2013cv01209
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC) and JOHN DOES 1-9
Plaintiff:
Demond Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012at00804
Defendant:
United States of America, Geo Group, Inc., Management and Training Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Edison v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012at00652
Plaintiff:
Gregory Edison
Defendant:
United States of America, The GEO Group, Inc. and JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bermudez v. City of Elk Grove et al
as 2:2008at01154
Plaintiff:
Frank Bermudez, Jr
Defendant:
City of Elk Grove, Robert Simmons, john does 1-9 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
