Cases 31 - 40 of 256
SCOTT v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv15790
Plaintiff:
KERIDA SCOTT
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv15119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FUSCHETTO v. RIVER et al
as 3:2021cv12742
Counter Claimant:
ADAM C WORTH, CHIEF MITCHELL A. LITTLE and TOMS RIVER
Counter Defendant:
MICHAEL FUSCHETTO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PARRISH v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC et al.
as 1:2021cv12662
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, NATASHA DOE, UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2021cv09298
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DALY, JAMES M. HUNT, JR., NEPTUNE of TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
AGUILAR v. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVOCACY AND RECOVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv06773
Defendant:
NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVOCACY AND RECOVERY, INC. doing business as NCAAD NEW JERSEY, INC., JOHN DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Plaintiff:
BARBARA AGUILAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
APARICIO v. COPPER RIVER SALON, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv04447
Defendant:
BARBARA WEIGAND, COPPER RIVER SALON, LLC, JOHN DOES ## 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
EVELIN APARICIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02964
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
