Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00305
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Hunter v. Murdoch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant: William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff: Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Asaro et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv10460
Plaintiff: Paulette Hasson, Lee Gargano, Barbara Duffy and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
John Duffy v. Andrew Saul
as 20-16108
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DUFFY
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
DUFFY et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv04453
Plaintiff: JOHN DUFFY and KAREN DUFFY
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUFFY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-04393
Plaintiff: JOHN DUFFY
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
DUFFY et al v. WEBCO CONTRACTING OF ABERDEEN, INC. et al
as 2:2011mc00210
Plaintiff: WILLIAM K. DUFFY , KENETH HUBER , PHILLIP CAPOBIANCO and others
Defendant: WEBCO CONTRACTING OF ABERDEEN, INC., WEBCO INC. and WILBERT E. BAKER
In re: Ted J. Duffy
as 10-80007
Respondent: In re: TED JOHN DUFFY, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 31, 1996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03930
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?