Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Malone v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Ladamien Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, City of Akron Police Department, John Edwards, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, US Parole Commission and 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Foland v. State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
John Edward Foland
Defendant:
State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Johnson
as 3:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Edward Floyd Johnson, Jr and John Edward Floyd Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbons v. Williams
as 4:2018cv02342
Petitioner:
John Edward Gibbons
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Medved v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice et al.
as 4:2016cv02334
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sink v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sink
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
